I know I'm past due for an NHL update. It's been a fairly eventful couple of weeks. I'm struggling with what to write about here and what to leave out.
I'll start by saying that things are good on the whole. Things are progressing, moving forward, feeling right. All of that is positive. We were hoping NHL would visit us here towards the end of June. We wanted her to see our house and our lives. We wanted her to have some time with our consultant one on one, and with all of us together. We hoped to time it over one of the big monthly meetings so she could meet some of the other folks in the service from all parts of the adoption constellation.
She was warming up to the idea and tentatively planning on a trip. Then a short while back she was in an accident. She's fine, the baby's fine but she was already wary of flying so far from her home before the baby is born. It adds a lot more stress to her life and we don't want to pressure her.
The trip was planned for about the time we can officially match. We're in this strange place now where we aren't truly matched but we're not seeing other people. There are many good reasons not to be matched until she's around 28 weeks but that doesn't mean we aren't relationship building.
One of the things that's been coming up a lot is the name game. This is also one of the things that's weighing heavy on my mind right now.
Back before we knew it was a girl, NHL had started sending us lists of boy names. I think the idea came from an initial conversation she had with our consultant. Now, I'm sure it's no surprise to anyone who's been reading for a while that our consultant has her own (sometimes peculiar) ways of doing things. One of the things she has a process for is naming the baby.
I'm not sure if all of you know how the process works in adoption situations. All adoptees have an original, unaltered birth certificate with all the information from their birth. This birth certificate is sealed upon finalization of the adoption. (As an aside, we're hoping to get a copy of this for our children before it's sealed so they'll have it). Then a new birth certificate is issued with some old information (time/doctor/witnesses) and some new information (adoptive parents). It can be really hard on some adoptees that have different names on their birth certificates.
I had a long discussion about this last week with a good friend who's an adoptee in reunion. She said she'd had 3 different names during her life (one set from her birth mother, one her foster parents and one from her adoptive parents). She said it didn't bother her to have had different names but she felt bad for her first mom who now had to call her by a different name after not knowing her for such a long time. It's funny because I think both her first name and current name fit her very well. Her adoptive mom was distraught when she found out they'd changed her name. They asked the agency if there had been a name given to her and the agency lied and said it was only "baby girl". Her parents have always seemed ahead of the curve in adoption issues so that wasn't a surprise they'd been concerned about these sorts of things from the beginning.
I believe that naming your child is an important part of claiming your child but it's also an incredibly charged and sensitive area, especially when trying to form a lasting bond through an open adoption. In a perfect world, our children will have the same name on both birth certificates and that name will be mutually agreed upon.
I think I might lose a lot of you here. I know this sounds strange but bear with me.
Our consultant likes to approach this by having the adoptive parents compose a list of three names and present them to the expectant mom/family. Then you work together to (hopefully) agree on a name that EVERYONE likes. She likes doing it this way because she had a couple of adoptions that nearly fell through because the first family hated the name the adoptive family planned on using.
So this is what she explained to us many months ago. This is also how she explained it to NHL. NHL loves the idea of being involved in the naming of this baby (and I really think she should) but it's been hard because she started sending us lists of names. Long lists of names.
I should digress and tell you I have very specific naming rules of my own. I think they might even deserve a post all to themselves. I think I'll do that post next but for now I want to focus on what all this brought up in me. Let's just say it wasn't exactly pretty.
It was easy enough when we didn't know the sex of the baby to not really engage about the names. I was secretly relieved when the baby was a girl because we had a fresh slate. I'm trying to learn how to navigate these boundaries. I'm trying to process what this all means to me and why it's so much harder to be confronted with this than all the other things I've given up along the way.
But when I get these lists of names its just so very hard. I do want NHL to be involved. I do want to be able to follow our rules and hers and to come up with something that will work for all of us. I want that to be in a way that's comfortable for me. I wasn't sure what that looked like.
I realized I really wanted the mister and I to have a nice solid list first. I wanted to spend some time, just the two of us enjoying this part of impending parenthood. I mean how awesome is it that we're making a list of names? It freakin' ROCKS! It's fun, fun, fun!
There's a lot to negotiate between the two of us. I really want our first child to have my last name. We're not going to be a family that all has the same last name and I have very strong reasons for wanting our first child to have my family name.
As much as we'd like to play the name game with NHL we needed a couple of rounds to ourselves. We've spent the last week or so thinking and ruminating. We have a short list that pleases us both. We're still not quite ready to share that yet. We're currently pinning that one on our "mean ol' consultant" who won't let us talk about names until we're matched.
It's so nice to be planning for the future, with a baby that might be ours (or maybe not and that's ok too). I can't imagine not including the NHL in these talks eventually but I can't handle doing that just yet.
I'm wondering how others have handled this situation. Did you find it as hard as I am? How did you include and/or honor your child's birth family in the process? If your child was given a name when they came to you (or when they were born), did you keep that name?
UP NEXT: The rules of the name game. Feel free to play along from home (or, perhaps a bit more likely for some of you, from work).
Name Game Rules: Just don't call her Dawn Marie. Ugh. When I parent's moved out of my childhood home in 1992, I was looking through all the cards my parents received when I was born. They all said - glad to hear you finally got your Dawn Marie. I was what? Who's Dawn Marie? My mom said that was her "girl"? name for all 4 pregnancies until she was about 7 months along with me. Thank you, Lord they changed their minds. I knew several Dawn Marie and they were all snotty. Me - I'm an angel. :-)
Posted by: Val | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 09:12
the name game is hard. hard. granted i didn't adopt - but my mister didn't even start thinking about names until my water broke. i'm showering and packing my bag - he's on the computer looking at babynames.com or whatever. granted we are much more the procrastinating type than you are. . .
and the original daisy mae was "baby girl" until the day we left the hospital. when the hospital administrator told us of all the woes we would go thru if we left the hospital with a birth certificate that said "baby girl". the names we kinda agreed on during labor - well dd just didn't "look" like any of those names.
Posted by: daisy mae | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 13:48
You're in foreign territory to me.
When we were picking a name, I made a list and DH scrapped names from it. A clear division of labour. :-S
Our main rule was that the name couldn't figure on the top 100 list of the last decade.
Posted by: Lut C. | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 14:14
In an open adoption, I think that is GREAT policy. Names are sensitive and this is a nice, and not insignificant way, to help the transition along. And leaves a lasting connection to the birth mother as well as you guys.
I would understand parents who didn't want to do this, but it seems right in your case.
Glad things are moving along!
Posted by: Rachel | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 14:57
We have an open adoption, our son had a name picked by his birth mum, he was called that for the first 6 weeks of his life (long story short, she was not sure if she wanted to go through with the placement & over here the baby cant be placed & the papers signed until 12 days after the birth). We didn't like the name, his middle name was a family name that all the boys have & we didn't think it fitted seeing as he was being placed. So we chose a new first name for him, birth mum liked it, we then gave our son his birth mums surname as a middle name, to keep the connection & so that he would always know what his birth families name was. We are hoping to adopt again and will do the same thing, use the family name as a middle name.
Posted by: Chrissy | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 18:31
So I'm adopted and I'm sort of glad that my name was changed. I found out my birth name for the first time I believe in my 20's. Not that the adoption thing was kept hidden or a taboo subject at all, it's just the name wasn't discussed. My name had been Doreen. Which just doesn't fit me at all.
I also have to admit that this might be one of the hardest things about adoption for me. I have had various names picked out since I was a teenager. They have changed through the years but I still have names I have my heart set on. To have someone veto that would really bother me. I guess that's one of those things that tells me I'm still not ready for adoption.
Posted by: Michell | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 21:49
this is all so very fascinating. you know how we're handling it, and it's gone more smoothly than your process so far.
it is so hard when it's such a personal thing and you feel like you've given up so much already along the way. and you DO deserve a few rounds by yourself. absolutely. it's one of the joys of impending parenthood to even be considering names. nothing should get in the way of that.
of course it would be nice if you can all agree beforehand. or maybe give her more input into the middle name and veto power over the first name. explain your personal rules and your family traditions and hope she respects that part of it while you try to honor her too.
this can be so hard. good luck!
Posted by: luna | Tuesday, 05 May 2009 at 23:30
It's funny, when I stumbled into the adoption parenthood world I knew nothing of the anxiety surrounding names. I came up with two names while on a walk by myself - Lydia and Celia - and ran the by my mister and he liked Celia. Our birth mom asked about the name and I shared it with her and she didn't like it. I went back to the drawing board and remembered she had mentioned Elena as a name she considered for her older daughter. We liked that name so we told her we would be happy to go from Celia to Elena. She laughed and said don't change your kid's name on my account. She put Celia on the original birth certificate and now seems comfortable with it.
Like I said, I didn't know the name was a big controversy, and for me it's never been that big of a deal. My mother named all of her kids whatever was the popular name at the time: Susan, Julie, Patti. My husband's name is Jason, the popular name in 1970. I didn't know much about domestic adoption when we started. We were just given our birth mom's name and number by our attorney, told she liked our profile and we just worked things out from there.
It's interesting seeing how an extremely hands on consultant operates. Now that I am better educated, I would approach the name thing more carefully than I did last time around. But, still, despite my clumsiness, it all worked out in the end. All the best during this stressful time!
Posted by: Patti | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 at 04:52
Oy- what a minefield. This is one of the reasons I found the idea of domestic adoption challenging- my children's names have particular relevance and meaning to us and our life stories- I've had my daughter's picked out since I was 14 years old. A third party added to the mix adds a whole new element. Good luck- and I can't wait to hear your rules. We had some pretty specific rules ourselves.
Posted by: Clover | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 at 07:55
I guess we were really really lucky. First mom wanted us to name our son. I guess because she was an adoptee also and she said that it was very important to her that we chose his name. She told our social worker that she wanted us to have that bond with him, which I think being adopted herself she understood more maybe? I don't know... I only had about 45 minutes to come up with a name though. Luckily, our son was a boy, I have had a boy's name picked out since I was about 18 years old(though my husband hated it, lol). I would have been literally screwed with a girl's name though. For some reason I never had envisioned having a girl. Kind of funny how things work out... Our son's middle name was a tad bit tricky though as I had not made it that far with a middle name but we decided to go my husbands middle name so that solved that situation, that was the hardest part of the name game for us. Coming up with his middle name. Good luck, I can't wait to hear you rules also.
Posted by: Kimmer | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 at 18:40
Wow. I'm psyched that you have gotten this far, fantastic! I totally hear you about the adoptive and birth (first) parents getting together on the name. It's hard, because it adds an extra person to negotiate with about the name, but it seems right, doesn't it? I don't have much to add to the discussion, but I will say that Zach has my last name as a middle name. And I know a couple of other people who did this, I think it is kind of the thing to do if you didn't take your husband's name.
Anyway, very excited for you!!!
Posted by: PBfish | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 at 20:07
We had two family members we wanted to honor -- and we wanted DD birthfamily to pick out a name as well -- so she ended up with a first name and two middle names. Luckily, the names we suggested were well received and we liked the name DD's birthfamily picked out -- so all were happy.
I do have to admit that we turned down being shown for a situaton where if it was a girl her name had to be Destiny and if it was a boy his name had to be "Birthfather's name, Jr." I couldn't handle the misuse of the Junior convention and Destiny was just not our style . . .
Good luck getting this all sorted and keeping fingers crossed things continue to be positive.
Posted by: MichelleL | Wednesday, 06 May 2009 at 20:21
I'm so intrigued to hear more!
I'll be reading anxiously . . .
Posted by: PiquantMolly | Thursday, 07 May 2009 at 17:55
I think your consultant's way of doing things is interesting. The good part of it is that it lets you start the process of the naming ritual...something that I think is critically important to the claiming process of parenthood and family. Because we are parents through adoption doesn't mean that the naming and claiming rituals are not important as well.
I'll be frank (as I always am). I was not prepared to relinquish naming to the expectant parent(s). I'm sure some could and would call me disparaging names because of that, but for me that was very important. So when we met J for the first time, during the dinner she asked about names we had considered. We told her that we had chosen Zara, since it means: the one we have waited for for so long, in an African language that I'm blanking on in my old age. She was like, "huh," I asked if she planned to name the baby, and she said she wasn't sure and was leaning toward not naming, though she did like the name Ayonna. Our turn to say, "huh."
Yet after that and through the remainder of the pregnancy, she referred to the baby as Zara. It was only after delivery that she decided to name her Ayonna, so that was put on her birth certificate.
When she was discharged to us, however, we moved back to Zara and J, her firstmom, has called her that ever since. I don't think there has been any contention or bitterness about this change, and but for the short time in the hospital, Zara has been Zara. I hope that we can explain this all to Z when she's old enough to understand it all and have it make sense.
But this is my long-winded way of saying that you are so very focused on doing the right and ethical thing, and that is laudable. The very fact that you think about it means that you are on the correct path. But ethical does not mean cheating yourself out of something that is clearly important to you. And truth be told, if adoption disrupts over a name, then that adoption was fragile from the beginning, IMO.
Just this sista's opinion, FWIW
Posted by: Liana | Friday, 08 May 2009 at 11:49
Well, I actually don't have an opinion but I am interested in knowing what criteria you have for names. For us, it was "looks good on law firm letterhead." Not that I want one of my kids to be a lawyer, but if they do, well, "Molly" or "Huck" just isn't going to cut it.
Posted by: chris | Saturday, 09 May 2009 at 13:03
I love reading this post and thread from everyone. Hearing how different it is for everyone so far brings a relieving smile to my face that our situation with J's birthmother was really a surprise to us that it would be so "simple" to go about naming. We met for the first time in person when she was 7 months along(after a few phone conversations) and the first question she asked us was if we had any girl names picked out. We had always discussed baby names while ttc and had thought of Noreen and Julia(the mister loved Julia because it was John Lennon's mothers name)... so we told her Noreen and honestly I saw her nose turn up. LOL then I quickly moved onto Julia and she said Perfect because it fit so well with letting her pick a middle name for the baby. So she said "Marie" for the middle name and we both gushed.. we loved it. I liked Grace for a middle name, but she said "Well, Julia Marie fits so well together". That was it, our daughter was named. We picked her first name and her birthmother picked her middle name. Much significance to Marie too, ironically, on her side of family and ours. Now that I look back at this all, we have a birth certificate with her given first and middle name. I love it.
Thanks for this post. It brings joy to me that you are able to work on such an exciting part of our adoption journey, the naming of a child. I can't wait to hear your names you and the mister have come up with.
Posted by: tubeless | Sunday, 10 May 2009 at 20:22
Ah, naming, the topic that has ignited many an adoption message board! LOL.
I think that as long as both parties are open and honest with each other, it is a good thing.
In our case I shared our top three- five names with T, and she liked them all. There was one she 'vetoed' but she liked everything else.
She wrote our daughter's name on the BC, and except for the surname, everything is the same. our daughter has always had the same identity. Ironically the surname and her middle name have the same initial if she ever wants to take back that part of her identity.
I can't wait to hear your naming criteria!
Posted by: louise | Wednesday, 13 May 2009 at 12:51